Agriculture & Controlled Environments

Greenhouse Heat Recovery and Dehumidification: Compare the Water and Heat Paths

Compare greenhouse water removal, heat recovery and operating conditions.

Written byYakeclimate Engineering TeamEngineering Team

Heat recovery can be integrated into a dehumidification route. Compare where water leaves and where the recovered heat goes before comparing the equipment.

Water removal and recovered heat

RouteWhere water leavesWhere heat goes
Ventilation with sensible recoveryMoist greenhouse air exits; removal depends on replacement air having a lower humidity ratioAn exchanger preheats incoming air with outgoing sensible heat
Internal condensation and direct returnWater condenses on a cold surface and is drainedA compressor cycle returns heat to the greenhouse air
Hydronic heat pump with buffersCondensation occurs in an air-handling unitHeat or cold moves through water circuits and can be buffered

Wageningen’s 2017 abstract describes ventilation exchangers and internal condensation as distinct principles. (WUR 2017) WUR’s 2025 report supports the direct-return and hydronic-buffer rows. (WUR 2025)

Humidity ratio means water-vapor mass per dry-air mass. Comparing indoor and outdoor RH percentages alone does not establish the drying potential of ventilation. (ASHRAE psychrometrics)

Why a wet exchanger is not an energy result

In the passive air-to-air arrangement described by WUR, exhaust-side condensation helps warm incoming air. Seeing condensate does not establish that all latent energy remains inside the greenhouse. (WUR 2025)

Check what the recovery core transfers

A DOE building-research example describes a moisture-permeable membrane that transfers heat and water vapour between supply and exhaust air. It is useful as a counterexample to assuming every recovery core transfers heat only, but it is building research rather than greenhouse performance evidence. (DOE ERV core)

Compare conditions before costs

A historical Dutch simulation compared cold-surface, forced-ventilation/exchanger, and hygroscopic routes under specified weather and investment assumptions; its result was conditional, not a current economic winner. (WUR historical simulation) WUR’s 2025 report also cautions that published performance figures may use different air conditions. (WUR 2025) For broader context, see ventilation vs dehumidification in controlled agriculture.

After identifying the water and heat paths, review direct-air and duct-connected layouts and humidity variation between crop zones. For the wider project context, return to agricultural humidity control.

About the author

Yakeclimate Engineering Team

Engineering Team

Yakeclimate technical articles are prepared by the engineering team using inputs from product development, application review, manufacturing, testing, and project support.

View author profile

Continue reading

More on agriculture & controlled environments

Project evidence

Related case studies

Project support

Ready to turn the operating conditions into a project brief?

Use the project-input checklist to help our team review the environment, moisture load, interfaces, installation limits, and validation needs from one consistent brief.
Send project requirements